SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(P&H) 9

M.L.SINGHAL
Daljinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Arun Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Deepak Agnihotri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M.L. Singhal, J. - Khazan Singh son of Rur Chand son of Hira Nand was owner and in possession of land measuring 55 kanals 17 marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Kanjari, Tehsil Nabha, and he had half share in "Chah Pukhta" bearing Khasra No. 28//26 of Khewat Khatauni No. 60/83 per jamabandi 1973-74. He died in June, 1975 leaving behind his daughter Smt. Harbans Kaur as his only heir. She continued to be owner and in possession of the land and chah pukhta after the death of her father as his sole heir. At the time of the death of Khazan Singh, in some land sugar cane/narma etc. was lying sown. In some land she got cultivated maize, fodder and ground nut through Avtar Singh son of Partap Singh, whom she had give it on batai. She apprehended her forcible dispossession from the land at the hands of Daljinder Singh alias Lakhwinder Singh son of Bhagat Singh son of Basawa Singh and others-defendants on the basis of will alleged to have been executed in their favour by Khazan Singh. Khazan Singh never executed any will in their favour. If they set up any will in their favour that is false and forged, having no effect on her rights so far as the inheritance of her fath


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top