SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1471

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Vinod K. Sharma, J.
Gurnam Bindra Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents
C.R. No. 3220 of 2007 (O&M).
Decided On : 27 August, 2008

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. G.S. Chahal, Mr. G.S. Sidhu and Ms. Gursreet Kaur, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.L. Gupta, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
For the Respondent No. 4:Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate.

A recount of votes cannot be ordered solely based on vague allegations and without specific evidence to support a prima facie case for recount. The secrecy of ballot papers must be maintained, and proper procedures must be followed in election disputes.

Headnote:

Election Petition - Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 - Section 76 - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was declared elected as the Municipal Councilor, Municipal Council, Mohali, while respondent No. 4 contested the election from the same ward and was defeated. Respondent No. 4 filed an election petition under Section 76 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, alleging irregularities in the election process and seeking a recount of votes.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations made by respondent No. 4 lacked specific particulars and evidence to support a prima facie case for recount. The court also noted that the order for recount was made without following the necessary procedures and without maintaining the secrecy of ballot papers.

Issues: The main issue was whether the order for recount of votes was justified based on the vague and unsubstantiated allegations made by respondent No. 4.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a recount of votes cannot be ordered solely based on vague allegations and without specific evidence to support a prima facie case for recount. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining the secrecy of ballot papers and following proper procedures in election disputes.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and set aside the order for recount, finding that it was made in violation of the law and without sufficient evidence to justify the recount.

JUDGMENT

Vinod K. Sharma, J. - This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been moved for quashing of order dated 8.5.2007 passed by respondent No. 3 with a consequential orders.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the present revision are that Election to the Municipal Council, Mohali was held on 30.7.2006 under the superintendence and control of the Punjab State Election Commission. The petitioner and respondent No. 4 contested the election from Ward No. 15. The petitioner was declared elected as the Municipal Councilor, Municipal Council, Mohali and is continuing as such. Respondent No. 4 was defeated by a margin of 52 votes in the said election. He filed an election petition on 29.8.2006 under Section 76 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 against the election of the petitioner on vague grounds without giving any material particulars. The written statement to the said election petition was filed by the petitioner on 19.12.2006 and the rejoinder was also filed to the written statement was also filed on 23.1.2007. The election petition was taken up on different dates and the orders passed by the Election Tribunal read as under :-

"File produced. Case called for. Counsel for the parties came present. The presiding officer has gone to attend the meeting in connection with Govt. works so case is fixed for 20/02/2007 for proper orders.

Sd/- Reader

06/02/2007

File produced. Case called for. Record not produced so the record be summoned from the lower court for 06/03/2007.

Sd/- TEJVIR SINGH

DC SAS NAGAR

20/02/2007

File produced. Case called for. Counsel for the parties came present. Two days time given to the counsel for the petitioner to inform the court what type of election record is required. File be put up for 07/03/2006.

Sd/- TEJVIR SINGH

DC SAS NAGAR

20/02/2007

File produced. Case called for. Counsel for the parties came present. Presiding officer being busy in meeting for Govt. works. File be put up for proper orders on 17/04/2007.

Sd/- READER

28/3/2007

File has been called. Counsel for the petitioner came present. Concerned record along with election petition has not received. Sh. Pardeep Bains Tehsildar-cum-returning officer, SAS Nagar and Sh. Dalip Election Tehsildar, SAS Nagar are bound down to produce complete record in respect of elections of Ward No. 15 held on 30/07/2006. The aforesaid record be produced in my court on 24/04/2007 at 2.00 p.m. by the aforesaid officers. In this regard information be also sent to Treasury Officer, Kharar. File be put up on 24/04/2007.

Sd/-

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-ELECTION TRIBUNAL

DC SAS NAGAR"

3. It is the case of the petitioner that on 17.4.2007 counsel for the petitioner Sh. Mohan Lal Setia was not present due to heart surgery and on said date an application was moved by the counsel for respondent No. 4 for summoning the election record of Ward No. 15. However, the copy of the said order was not supplied to the petitioner. On 1 8.4.2007 a news report appeared in the various newspapers stating therein that the Election Tribunal-cum- Deputy Commissioner has ordered the recounting of votes and the said recounting took place on 24.4.2007. The petitioner filed a writ petition No. 5874 of 2007 and on 23.4.2007, this Court passed the following order :-

"Notice of motion for April 26, 2007, accepted by Mr. Vivek Sood, Advocate, on behalf of respondent No. 4. Copy of order dated April 17, 2007 whereunder recount has been ordered for tomorrow, has been delivered to the learned counsel for the petitioner today in court. In the meanwhile proceedings for recount which are scheduled for April 24, 2007 at 2.00 PM shall continue but shall be subject to any order passed in this petition. However, in the event of recount going against the petitioner, no further order shall be passed by the Election Tribunal, as a result of said recount. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Special Secretary of this Branch."

4. It was during the pendency of












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top