SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 329

R.L.ANAND
Nanak Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ami Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Arun Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. M.S. Jain, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

R.L. Anand, J. - This is a defendants appeal and has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 4.8.1977 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, who accepted the appeal of the plaintiffs by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 2.3.1976, passed by the Court of Sub Judge Ist Class, Palwal who dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs with costs.

2. The brief facts of the case are that S/Shri Ami Lal, Brij Lal and Smt. Bohati filed a suit for possession against Shri Nanak Chand son of Jiwan Lal defendant No. 1 by adding Kanhiya, Dharamvir and Smt. Kariya as defendants No. 2, 3 and 4 on the basis of the ownership and it has been averred by the plaintiffs that Smt. Bahali widow of Budhi son of Rupa was the owner in possession of the suit land mentioned in para No. 1 of the plaint and she died in the year 1964 and parties inherited her estate according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as per pedigree table given in para No. 2 of the plaint which is reproduced as follows :-


3. The plaintiffs have further pleaded that Jiwan Lal, husband of Kariya and defendant No. 4 Smt. Kariya were very cunning person and after the death of Smt. Bahali both got sanctione



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top