M.M.KUMAR
Ved Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Parshottam Dass – Respondent
M.M. Kumar, J. - This is plaintiffs petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, the Code) challenging order dated 25.7.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhatinda. The application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code during the pendency of appeal preferred by him against the judgment and decree dated 29.11.1995 has been dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge.
2. Brief facts of the case which have led to the filing of the instant petition are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a civil suit seeking permanent injunction against defendant-respondent 2 who is his brother and one Parshottam Dass restraining them from alienating half share of House No. 1504 situated in Gali No. 2, Nai Basti, Bhatinda. The claim of the plaintiff- petitioner was based on an alleged family settlement. It was further claimed that defendant-respondent 2 Dharam Paul who had entered into an agreement to sell the disputed house in favour of defendant-respondent 1 Parshottam Dass had no right to alienate half share which has vested in the plaintiff- appellant by virtue of the family settlement.
3. Plainti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.