V.K.BALI
Kimti Lal Jain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
V.K. Bali, J. (Oral) - Vide a detailed order dated May 19, 2000, running into fifteen pages, recorded in Crl. Misc. No. 10738-M of 2000, Kimti Lal Jain, applicant herein, was allowed anticipatory bail. Operative part of order aforesaid, passed by K.S. Kumaran, J. reads thus :-
"Accordingly this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner on the allegations found in the FIR mentioned in this petition, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing sufficient surety to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. However, if the association of the petitioner is necessary for the purpose of further investigation, the investigating officer shall issue notice to the petitioner giving him sufficient time to join investigation and on such notice, the petitioner shall join investigation. The petitioner shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Criminal Procedure Code"
2. Sub-section (2) of Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code deals with conditions that may be imposed when High Court or Court of Sessions makes a direction under sub- section (1). One such condition is that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.