SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1017

MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Rattan Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shruti Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. H.L. Tikka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: (Oral) - The matrix of the facts & material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for disposal of the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that, petitioners-accused M/s Rattan Industries Ltd. through its Director Rakesh Bansal, had purchased hosiery items, from complainant-respondent Shruti Gupta wife of Rohit Gupta, sole proprietor of M/s Bharti Knits (for brevity “the complainant”) at Ludhiana, during the financial year 2011-12 against the credit from time to time. The complainant-company is stated to have maintained regular account books during the course of its business, which are duly audited by the Chartered Accountant. The complainant repeatedly requested the petitioners to make payment in lieu of hosiery goods, but in vain. Ultimately, they issued two cheques, bearing Nos.122394 dated 29.12.2011 for an amount of ` 12,40,000/- & 122396 dated 29.1.2012 for a sum of ` 12,31,250/-, drawn on ING Vysya Bank Ltd. East of Kailash Branch, New Delhi to the complainant at Ludhiana. The complainant presented the indicated cheques for collection through its banker Punjab National Bank, Ludhiana, but the same were received back d

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top