MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Parminder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral) - Tersely, the facts and material, which need a necessary mention for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record are that, initially in the wake of complaint of complainant-Dalbir Kaur widow of Jaipal Singh Dhillon, respondent No.2(for brevity “the complainant”), a criminal case was registered against the petitioner and his other co-accused, by means of FIR No.389 dated 14.11.2006, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, by the police of Police Station Civil Lines Amritsar.
2. The complainant claimed that her husband Jaipal Singh Dhillon was the owner of the land in question, situated in village Manwala, Tehsil and District Amritsar. After his death, she along with his other LRs, inherited and became owner of the entire property left by Jaipal Singh Dhillon(deceased). According to the complainant that, the petitioner accused-Parminder Singh and his other co-accused had fraudulently prepared a forged General Power of Attorney dated 13.09.1995 of Jaipal Singh Dhillon and her uncle Madan Gopal Si
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.