HEMANT GUPTA, RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Raksha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board – Respondent
Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.: - The above-mentioned Letters Patent Appeals arise out of an order dated 6.10.2010 in CWP No. 1122 of 2003, filed by appellant-Raksha Rani (hereinafter referred to as an ‘Allottee’), wherein challenge was to Annexures P.14 and P.15, demanding extension fee from the said appellant. The appellant has also sought refund of the interest deposited by her towards the payment of installments and penalty. LPA No. 1168 of 2011 has been filed by the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (for short ‘the Board’) and Market Committee, Kalka against the same order.
2. The learned Single Judge, has disposed of a number of writ petitions vide the same order dated 6.10.2010. The appeals arising out of the said order have been preferred by the allottees and the Board, including the Market Committee. Certain other appeals have been preferred by the parties aggrieved against the order passed by the learned Single Judge based upon the said order dated 6.12.2010 and also the orders passed by the learned Single Judge on the same lines, but without reference to the order dated 6.12.2010. Certain writ petitions claiming similar relief are also listed for hearing. All the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.