SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(P&H) 196

TEK CHAND
Kirori Mal s/o L. Shambhu Nath – Appellant
Versus
Collector Delhi State, Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K. Bhargawa and R.M. Gupta, for Petitioner; S.N. Shanker, for Respondents.

ORDER :- These are two Civil Revisions Nos. 480-D of 1961 and 481-D of 1961 from the order of the trial Court rejecting the plaint in the event it is not amended by a stated date. In Civil Revision No. 480-D of 1961 the plaintiff petitioner is Shri Karori Mal and the defendant respondents are Collector of Delhi, Special Assistant Collector and the Union of India. In Civil Revision No. 481-D of 1961 the respondents are the same and the plaintiff-petitioner is Shri Karori Mal Charity Trust, Rai Garh, through one of the trustees. In both suits the prayer relates to declaration of title of the plaintiffs with respect to the property which is the subject-matter of respective suits.

In the suit instituted by Shri Karori Mal it is alleged that in his individual capacity he purchased House No. 3 on Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi, for a valuable consideration by a registered sale deed dated 11th of April 1951 and is in possession of that property. In the prayer clause he has stated that a decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants declaring that Bungalow No. 3, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi, belongs to and is exclusively in possession of the plaintiff. The circumstances wh





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top