SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 484

Paramjeet Singh
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-38118 of 2012):Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate.
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-3345 of 2013):Mr. J.S. Khiva, Advocate.
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-4860 of 2013):Mr. J.S. Bedi, Advocate.
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-5640 of 2013):Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate.
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-6423 of 2013):Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate.
For the Petitioners (In Crl. Misc. Nos. M-7607 &
7608 of 2013):Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate.
For the Petitioner (In Crl. Misc. No. M-7791 of 2013):Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate.
Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):- This order shall dispose of Crl. Misc. No. M-38118 of 2012, M-3345 of 2013, M-4860 of 2013, M-5640 of 2013, M-6423 of 2013, M-7607 of 2013, M-7608 of 2013 and M-7791 of 2013 as they arise from the same FIR.

2. The petitioners in the abovesaid petitions have approached this Court under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.04 dated 21.7.2012 registered under Sections 409/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC and Sections 13(1)(d)/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Bathinda, District Bathinda, Punjab, wherein the challan and supplementary challans have already been filed.

3. The brief facts, as mentioned in the FIR, are to the effect that Vigilance Bureau, Bathinda, conducted an Inquiry dated 2.5.2012 against Joginder Singh XEN. During inquiry, it was found that Joginder Singh XEN and Satpal Bansal, Superintendent, who has since retired, had prepared a forged LOC vide letter No.1024 dated 14.6.2010 for Rupees two crore twenty five lacs and LOC letter No.1124 dated 3.8.2012 for Rupees two hundred eighty one lacs in connivance with each other and purported to have been issue






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top