A.K.Sikri, Rakesh Kumar Jain
Sat Pal Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of Patiala – Respondent
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.:- The appellant, a JMGS-1 (Junior Management Grade Scale-I) officer, was discharged from service as Branch Manager, Branch Office, Dhilwan Kalan (Distt. Faridkot) vide order dated 2.6.2000 w.e.f. 28.4.2000 i.e. from the date of his conviction by the Special CBI Court, Patiala under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in which he was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years. However, the conviction and sentence was set aside in Criminal Appeal No.438-SB of 2000 titled as Sat Pal Dhawan Vs. State allowed vide order dated 15.2.2010.
2. The appellant was placed under suspension on 10.3.1998 due to commission of criminal offence but after his acquittal he superannuated on 31.3.2003.
3. He had prayed in the writ petition for grant of terminal benefits on the basis of last pay drawn at the time of superannuation because he was being paid pension on the basis of his pay drawn at the time when the suspension order was issued in the year 1998.
4. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition to the extent of directing the respondent to draw calculations on the basis of last pay drawn as on the date of su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.