SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 318

A.K.Sikri, Rakesh Kumar Jain
Sat Pal Dhawan – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of Patiala – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.:- The appellant, a JMGS-1 (Junior Management Grade Scale-I) officer, was discharged from service as Branch Manager, Branch Office, Dhilwan Kalan (Distt. Faridkot) vide order dated 2.6.2000 w.e.f. 28.4.2000 i.e. from the date of his conviction by the Special CBI Court, Patiala under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in which he was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years. However, the conviction and sentence was set aside in Criminal Appeal No.438-SB of 2000 titled as Sat Pal Dhawan Vs. State allowed vide order dated 15.2.2010.

2. The appellant was placed under suspension on 10.3.1998 due to commission of criminal offence but after his acquittal he superannuated on 31.3.2003.

3. He had prayed in the writ petition for grant of terminal benefits on the basis of last pay drawn at the time of superannuation because he was being paid pension on the basis of his pay drawn at the time when the suspension order was issued in the year 1998.

4. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition to the extent of directing the respondent to draw calculations on the basis of last pay drawn as on the date of su







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top