PARAMJEET SINGH, J.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court commented on the plight of a decree holder in India and observed as under in Satyawati vs. Rajinder Singh and another 2013 (7) Scale 371.

“2. In relation to the difficulties faced by a decree holder in execution of the decree, in 1872, the Privy Council had observed that “......... the difficulties of a litigant in India

begin when he has obtained a Decree....”.

3. Even today, in 2013, the position has not been improved and still the decree holder faces the same problem which was being faced in the past. We are concerned with the case of the appellant-plaintiff who had succeeded in Civil Appeal No.89 of 1993 in the Court of District Judge, Faridabad on 19th January, 1996. Decree was drawn in pursuance of the aforestated judgment but till today, the appellant-plaintiff is not in a position to get

fruits of his success.”

In the present case, the plight of respondent no.1 (for convenience of reference hereinafter referred to as decree-holder) is even worse as he has been litigating since 1978 and undergoing the whirlwind of law in getting the fruits of ejectment order passed in 1985 by the Rent Controller which attained finality after n