SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1786

JASBIR SINGH, RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the applicant.

Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.:—

The instant application under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr. P. C. ' for short), has been filed by the complainant, seeking leave to file appeal against the impugned judgment of dated 25.7.2011, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, whereby the accused-respondents were acquitted of the charges framed against them.

The criminal law was set into motion by the applicantcomplainant with the allegation that the accused have committed the offence in question. However, in order to avoid repetition and also for the sake of brevity, it would be appropriate to refer to the facts as noticed by the learned trial court and the same read, as under:-

“A complaint was filed in the court of learned Ilaqa Magistrate, Faridabad by complainant Raj Singh. It was stated therein by the complainant that he is a poor person. He is an agriculturist and brings up his family. There was a litigation between the complainant and accused regarding partition proceedings with regard to the agricultural land. He (complainant) referred an appeal in the Court of SDM, Ballabgarh, which is still pending, For this reason, the accused nursed grudge ag























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top