G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Jagdish Parshad – Appellant
Versus
Trilok Chand – Respondent
The present revision pe#31;tition has been filed by the tenant, who is ag#31;grieved against the findings recorded by the authorities below by virtue of which the eject#31;ment application of the respondent-landlord has been allowed.
2. The ejectment application had been filed under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter called The Rent Act) by the landlord-respondent on the ground that Jagdish Parshad was the tenant of the rented land shown by letters ABC in the site plan filed alongwith the petition at a monthly rent of Rs. 200 and the land was in the shape of a triangle measuring 10' x 7-1/2' and out of this area, the Municipal Committee, Rewari had encroached upon 2-1/2' area for constructing a drain. The ground of ejectment was that the rent was not being paid and material alteration had been done. The rent note was dated 16.06.1987 for 11 months in favour of the previous landlady Bhag-wati Devi and in the rent note, it was mentioned that the tenant would use the rented land by plac#31;ing rehri and would not raise any construction on the land and the tenant had raised construction on the rented land without th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.