SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1408

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sheokaran Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :P.S. Jammu, Advocate

Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.

1. A suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff, petitioner herein, is owner and in possession of 208/1855th share of the land in dispute and gift deed dated 9.7.2012 allegedly executed by respondent-defendant No. 1 in favour of respondent-defendant No. 2 is illegal, wrong and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff, is pending adjudication before the lower court wherein the plaintiff vide impugned order of 20.4.2013 (Annexure P-1) has been called upon to make good deficiency in payment of court fee by affixing ad valorem court fee according to the value of the subject matter of the suit. Though counsel for the respondents had made appearance on 9.12.2013 but on the date of arguments i.e. 9.10.2014 despite several pass overs, none had made appearance resulting in ex-parte proceedings against them.

2. It is case of the petitioner/plaintiff that he is in possession of the suit land pursuant to the family settlement. He is thus not seeking possession of the land. Gift deed dated 9.7.2012 which concededly is without any consideration, is under challenge. He is not a party to the same. Property is claimed to be ancestral. Support has been sough





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top