SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 671

MUTTACI JEYAPAUL
Joginder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


For the Appellant :B.K. Mann and Ravi Malhotra, Advocates
For the Respondents: Ritu Punj, Addl. A.G.

Muttaci Jeyapaul, J.:-

1. Accused Joginder Singh has challenged the judgment passed by the trial Court whereby he has been convicted under Section 306 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of ` 1000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further period of two months.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused got married to Dilbagh Kaur in the year 1991. He taunted his wife and beat her quite often. In spite of the fact that he was blessed with three children, the accused wanted to remarry. Therefore, Dilbagh Kaur having been fed up with the conduct of the accused, took poisonous substance and committed suicide. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused abetted Dilbagh Kaur to commit suicide.

3. PW1 Gulzar Singh, the brother of Dilbagh Kaur, set the law in motion by lodging a complaint. He has deposed that his sister Dilbagh Kaur who was married to accused Joginder Singh in the year 1991 was blessed with three children. After one year of marriage, the accused started taunting his sister saying that she was not educated and she had no manners to behave. Compelling Dilbagh Kaur to bring her share from his parents,































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top