SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1532

PARAMJEET SINGH
Dhup Singh – Appellant
Versus
Pheru – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Kabir Sarin, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Paramjeet Singh, J.

This second appeal arises from a suit for recovery of Rs. 11,000/- filed by plaintiff-Dhup Singh on account of 'bahi' entries made by father of defendants' for taking a loan of Rs. 6,300/- which was decreed by the Court of first instance and appeal preferred by defendants no.1 to 3 has been accepted by the lower Appellate Court and judgment and decree of the Court of first instance have been set aside.

2. The detailed facts are already recapitulated in the judgments of the courts below and are not required to be reproduced. However, the brief facts relevant for disposal of this regular second appeal are that plaintiff-Dhup Singh approached the Court of first instance seeking a decree for recovery of Rs. 11,000/- on the allegations that on miti Jyesth Sudi 13, Samwat 2032, Rehamu alias Rama Nand, father of the defendants, borrowed a sum of Rs. 6,300/- from him and executed a 'bahi' entry in this regard after appending his signatures in Urdu script. Thereafter on miti Jyesth Sudi 13, Samwat 2035 corresponding to 19.06.1978, Rehamu @ Ramanand got his account settled with the plaintiff admitting that a sum of Rs. 8,100/- (' 6300/- as principal amount and Rs.





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top