SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 68

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, SHEKHER DHAWAN
Deepak Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Mr. D.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bikramjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate, for the appellant. (in LPA No.559 of 2015).
Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate for Mr. Kunal Mulwani and Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocates, for the appellant. (in LPA No.977 of 2015).
Mr.H.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the appellant. (in LPA No.1405 of 2015).
Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. AG, Punjab.
Mr. Gurminder Singh, Senior Advocate with, Mr. R.P.S.Bara and Ms. Daman Preet Kaur, Advocates, for respondents No.6, 15, 24 and 40.
Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.P.S.Bhinder, Advocate, for respondents No.20 and 21.
Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.B.S.Randhawa, Advocate, for respondents No.43 to 52. (in LPA No.559 of 2015).
Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddhant Kant, Advocates, for respondents No.43 to 46.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for respondents No.53 to 55.
Mr. A.K.Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.56 to 61.
Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate, for applicant (in CM No.3559 in LPA 559 of 2015).

JUDGMENT :

SHEKHER DHAWAN,J.

The above titled three intracourt appeals, bearing LPA Nos. 599, 977 and 1405 of 2015 under Clause X of the Letters Patent have been filed by the appellant against the common order dated 8.1.2015 passed by learned Single Judge, whereby five writ petitions [bearing CWP Nos. 25960, 26310, 26370, 26780 of 2014 and CWP No. 17 of 2015] were allowed.

2. Relevant facts of the case are that respondents challenged the selection process initiated by Punjab Public Service Commission, Patiala [for short, “the Commission”] for appointment to 120 vacancies of Punjab Civil Services [Executive Branch] and Allied Services by prescribing minimum 33% marks for each paper. As per the petitioners, the same was against the mandate of circular dated 3.1.2014 [Annexure P/3] prescribing procedure and pattern. Advertisement No. 9 dated 6th December, 2013 [Annexure P/1] was issued by the Commission. The procedure and scheme for conduct of Preliminary and Mains examination was notified by the Commission on 3.1.2014 itself. The syllabus and procedure for conducting the competitive exam































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top