SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 38

SURINDER GUPTA
Shashi – Appellant
Versus
Jai Krishan Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. V.K. Garg, Advocate for respondent no. 4 Insurance Company.

JUDGMENT :

Surinder Gupta, J.

This judgment will dispose of above captioned two appeals filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar (later referred to as 'the Tribunal') for the death of their sons, namely; Anuj aged 23 years and Saurav aged 25 years in a motor accident with truck bearing registration No. JK02E7441 (later referred to as 'the offending vehicle').

2. Case of claimants, in brief, is that on 08.07.2007, at about 07.30 p.m., Anuj alongwith Saurav (brother), Vishal, Mayank and Jatin were returning from Vaishno Mata to Jalandhar in Indica Car bearing registration no. PB08AZ1054. Anuj was driving the car very carefully at normal speed. When they reached near village Dadua, Tehsil and District Reasi, Jammu and Kashmir, the offending vehicle came in a rash and negligent manner and hit the car of Anuj resulting in death of Anuj at the spot. Saurav received serious injuries and was brought to Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana where he remained admitted from 10.07.2007 to 14.07.2007 and ultimately su
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top