Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved against the impugned order dated 3.8.2016 (Annexure P-7), passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Palwal-respondent No. 3, petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for quashing the impugned order.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. This is the second round of litigation. At an earlier point of time, petitioner approached this court by way of CWP No. 9195 of 2016, which was disposed of vide order dated 12.5.2016 ( Annexure P-6), with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Palwal, to take a decision on the representation dated 11.1.2016, moved by the petitioner, within a period of three months. In compliance of the abovesaid order passed by this Court, For Subsequent orders see LPA-2066-2016 Deputy Commissioner, Palwal, passed the impugned order dated 3.8.2016 (Annexure P-7), which is wrongly typed as dated 3.8.2014 at page 50 of the paper book.

4. Thrust of the arguments raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of averments taken in the writ petition, is that respondent No. 4 was n