RAJESH BINDAL, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Kaur Sain Spinners Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.
1. The petition has been filed praying for directions that notifications dated 17.06.2002 and 12.09.2002 (Annexures P-17 and P-20) be treated as inoperative qua the petitioner-Company on the doctrine of promissory estoppel and that the respondent –State of Punjab be restrained from going back on its promise of providing sales-tax exemption to the petitioner Company as per the Industrial Policy, 1996 and subsequent notifications.
2. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the letters dated 24.09.2002 (Annexure P-19) and 04.12.2002 (Annexure P-21), whereby the petitioner company has been informed that it is ineligible for grant of sales tax exemption.
3. The petitioner is a limited company incorporated with the objective to carry on business as manufacturer, processor, dealer, distributor, agent, buyer, seller, importer and exporter of hosiery goods, knitting yarn and fabrics of various kinds.
4. The Government of Punjab, Department of Industries had notified a Package of Incentives-1992 on 28.09.1992 for attracting fresh investment to boost gro
Ashoka Smokeless Coal India (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Devi Multiplex and another v. State of Gujarat and others
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. and another v. State of Haryana and others
Manuelsons Hotels (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala
S.V.A. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. and others v. State of Kerala and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.