SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B. SINHA AND P.P. NAOLEKAR,JJ.
ASHOKA SMOKELESS COAL INDIA (P) LTD. AND OTHERS Appellants;
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents.
Civil Appeals No. 5302 of 2006 with Nos. 5329, 5303 - 05, 5324, 5306 - 14, 5317, 5315,5318 - 23,5316 of 2006 with TCs (C) Nos. 89 - 124,126 - 36 of 2005, 4 - 5, 7 - 45, 75, 125, 137 - 39 of 2006 with CAs Nos. 5547 of 2004 and 2972 - 76 of 2005 and WP (C) No. 67 of 2005
Decided on December 1, 2006
Advocates appeared:
Gopal Subramanium and A. Sharan, Additional Solicitors General, A.K Ganguli, Altaf Ahmed, Jaideep Gupta, Dipankar Gupta, S.K Bagga, Shanti Bhushan, Bhaskar Gupta, Mahabir Singh, K Radhakrishnan and T.R. Andhyarujina, Senior Advocates (S.D. Sanjay, Devashish Bharuka, Pankaj Bhagat, Ms Hansa Bharuka, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Rana Mukherjee, Siddharth Gautam, Goodwill Indeevar, M.P. Jha, Ram Ekbal Roy, Harshvardhan Jha, Amit Meharia, Mohan Prasad Meharia, Seeraj Bagga, C Ms Sureshta Bagga, Bijan Kr. Ghosh, Sukhendu Sekhar, Rajiv Mehta, B. Aggarwal, A. Henry, T. Anil Kumar, Manish Shankar Verma, Anupam Lal Das, Arjun V. Bobde, Hrishikesh Baruah, Ms Jyoti Mendiratta, Manish Pitale, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Rajesh Singh, Ms Gouri Karuna Das, Anu Gupta, Kamal Kant Tripathi, Rudreshwar Singh, Tapesh Kr. Singh, Manish Kr. Saran, Dr. Meena Agarwal, R.C. Mishra, Anil Kr. Sinha, Gaurav Agrawal, S. Chandra Shekhar, Ms Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Manoj Sharma, P.K. Jain, Surya Kant, KS. Bhati, Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Anip Sachthey, Ajit d Kr. Sinha, Krishan Mahajan, Satyakam, Navin Prakash, V.K. Verma, Chetan Sharma, Rajiv nanda, Ms Ramni Taneja, Balu G., Nishant Gupta, Ms Vani Mehta, Ms Vimla Sinha, Gopal Singh, Shriniwas R. Khalap, Mohit Paul, C. Mukund, Ashok Kr. Jain, Animesh Saha, Bijoy Kr. Jain, Pankaj Jain, B.B. Singh, Ms Manik Karanjawala, N.D.B. Raju, Ms Bharathi R., N. Ganpathy, Guntur Prabhakar and Rajendra Kumar, Advocates) for the appearing parties.
Key Points: - Coal companies as State instruments are bound by constitutional obligations under Articles 39(b) and 14, requiring them to distribute an essential commodity at a fair and reasonable price, not driven purely by profit (!) (!) (!) . - The e‑auction scheme must ensure transparent, equal opportunity for all buyers, but its current implementation allowing participation by core sector and traders undermines the distinction between linked and non‑linked consumers and violates Article 14 (!) (!) (!) . - Non‑linked consumers, especially small‑scale and hard‑coke manufacturers, are entitled to protection against arbitrary pricing and discriminatory treatment, and any deviation from the linkage system must be based on genuine consumer identification and public interest (!) (!) (!) .
Judgment
S.B. SINHA, J. -
Introduction
1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.
2. The validity and/or legality of a scheme framed by Coal India Limited for sale of coal by electronic auction (e - auction) is in question in these appeals and transferred applications.
3. "Coal" indisputably plays an important role in the development of b economy of the country. It had been the subject - matter of regulatory measures even under the Defence of India Rules. Production, distribution, supply and price of coal were controlled and regulated under the Colliery Control Order, 1945 (the 1945 Order) framed under the said Rules. The said Order was continued under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Under the Colliery Control Order, the Coal Controller was even authorised to allot quotas of coal to the Central Government as well as the State Governments; C although the said procedure is now not in vogue in view of decontrolling notifications issued there under by the Central Government from time to time. The quality as well as quantity of coal required by all consumers used to be regulated by the Coal Controller. Coal was the only mineral which was subjected to nationalisation, in terms of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973. d Even coal - mining leases granted to the lessees stood terminated by reason of Section 4 - A of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 in the year 1976.
4. Coal is used as a primary raw material in many core sectors which are vital for the economy of the country e.g. power, steel, oil, etc. Fixation of price of coal by the Central Government, regarding the quality thereof, had e all along been subjected to statutory orders. The gradation of coal dependent upon the quality thereof was to be determined by the "Coal Board" constituted under the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act. Quality of coal may depend not only on the location of the coal mines but also on the particular seams wherefrom it is extracted. Requirement of maintenance of fixed price of coal on an all - India basis, as far as practicable f had all along been considered to be imperative in the economic and industrial development of the country.
Control over coal
5. Coal indisputably is an essential commodity. Its importance is widely accepted. The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was enacted inter alia for securing equitable distribution and availability of essential commodities at g fair price. Coal despite partial deregulation having regard to the Colliery Control Order, 2000 (the 2000 Order) is still a regulated commodity.
6. The 1945 Order made provisions for regulating production, supply and distribution of coal. It dealt with class of coal, grade of coal, size of coal and price of coal. Clause (3) empowered the Central Government to prescribe classes, sizes, grades, etc. into which coal may be categorised as also the h specifications thereof on the said basis.
7. Whereas coking coal having inherent property of swelling on heating is essentially used for metallurgical purposes in the steel plant for production of steel, all other categories of coal are non - coking coals. Non - coking coal is used as a raw material in manufacturing processes such as cement, graphite, soft coke, domestic fuel and for production of various products such as glass, food processing, ceramics, chemicals, re - rolling mills, salt glazed stoneware pipes, refractory used for steel - making, etc. The different sizes of the coal are inter alia known as "Run of the Mine", "Steam" and "Slack". The price of coal depends not only with reference to the grade but size as also the seams situated in the coking coal mines or coal mines, as the case may be.
8. Clauses 12 - Band 12 - E of the 1945 Order were, however, invoked by the Central Government from time to time by issuing notifications as a result whereof controls over price and distribution of coal were withdrawn. However,
Kerala State Electricity Board v. M/s. S.N. Govinda Prabhu Bros. and Others etc.
Mahabir Auto Stores and Others v. Indian Oil Corporation and Others
Shri Sitaram Sugar Company Ltd. v. Union of India
Hindustan Zinc Ltd. etc. v. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board and Others
Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Others
Referred to : Pallavi Refractories and Ors.v. SCCL and Ors.
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai and Others
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Nandlal Jaiswal
Pawan Alloys and Casting Pvt. Ltd., Meerut v. U.P. State Electricity Board and Others
Indra Sawhney-II v. Union of India
Mohd. Usman v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others
Union of India and Others etc. v. Hindustan Development Corpn. and Others
Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company etc. v. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited and Anr. etc.
Baburao Shantaram More v. The Bombay Housing Board and Another
Dwarkadas Marfatia and Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Pathumma and Others v. State of Kerala and Others
Also see Samatha v. State of A. P.
Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Another v. Union of India and Others
M.R.F. Ltd. v. Inspector Kerala Govt. and Others
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka
Also see B. P. Sharma v. Union of India
Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka
State of Punjab v. Nestle India Ltd. and Another
State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
E.V Chinnaiah etc. v. State of A.P. and Others etc.
Commr. of Police v. Gordhandas Bhanji
State of Orissa and Others v. Hari Narain Jaiswal and Ors.
State of Karnataka and Anr. v. Shri Ranganatha Reddy and Anr.
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commnr.
M/s. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport of India and Others
Tara Prasad Singh and Others v. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.