SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1223

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B. SINHA AND P.P. NAOLEKAR,JJ.
ASHOKA SMOKELESS COAL INDIA (P) LTD. AND OTHERS Appellants;
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents.
Civil Appeals No. 5302 of 2006 with Nos. 5329, 5303 - 05, 5324, 5306 - 14, 5317, 5315,5318 - 23,5316 of 2006 with TCs (C) Nos. 89 - 124,126 - 36 of 2005, 4 - 5, 7 - 45, 75, 125, 137 - 39 of 2006 with CAs Nos. 5547 of 2004 and 2972 - 76 of 2005 and WP (C) No. 67 of 2005
Decided on December 1, 2006
Advocates appeared:
Gopal Subramanium and A. Sharan, Additional Solicitors General, A.K Ganguli, Altaf Ahmed, Jaideep Gupta, Dipankar Gupta, S.K Bagga, Shanti Bhushan, Bhaskar Gupta, Mahabir Singh, K Radhakrishnan and T.R. Andhyarujina, Senior Advocates (S.D. Sanjay, Devashish Bharuka, Pankaj Bhagat, Ms Hansa Bharuka, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Rana Mukherjee, Siddharth Gautam, Goodwill Indeevar, M.P. Jha, Ram Ekbal Roy, Harshvardhan Jha, Amit Meharia, Mohan Prasad Meharia, Seeraj Bagga, C Ms Sureshta Bagga, Bijan Kr. Ghosh, Sukhendu Sekhar, Rajiv Mehta, B. Aggarwal, A. Henry, T. Anil Kumar, Manish Shankar Verma, Anupam Lal Das, Arjun V. Bobde, Hrishikesh Baruah, Ms Jyoti Mendiratta, Manish Pitale, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Rajesh Singh, Ms Gouri Karuna Das, Anu Gupta, Kamal Kant Tripathi, Rudreshwar Singh, Tapesh Kr. Singh, Manish Kr. Saran, Dr. Meena Agarwal, R.C. Mishra, Anil Kr. Sinha, Gaurav Agrawal, S. Chandra Shekhar, Ms Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Manoj Sharma, P.K. Jain, Surya Kant, KS. Bhati, Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Anip Sachthey, Ajit d Kr. Sinha, Krishan Mahajan, Satyakam, Navin Prakash, V.K. Verma, Chetan Sharma, Rajiv nanda, Ms Ramni Taneja, Balu G., Nishant Gupta, Ms Vani Mehta, Ms Vimla Sinha, Gopal Singh, Shriniwas R. Khalap, Mohit Paul, C. Mukund, Ashok Kr. Jain, Animesh Saha, Bijoy Kr. Jain, Pankaj Jain, B.B. Singh, Ms Manik Karanjawala, N.D.B. Raju, Ms Bharathi R., N. Ganpathy, Guntur Prabhakar and Rajendra Kumar, Advocates) for the appearing parties.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Coal companies as State instruments are bound by constitutional obligations under Articles 39(b) and 14, requiring them to distribute an essential commodity at a fair and reasonable price, not driven purely by profit (!) (!) (!) . - The e‑auction scheme must ensure transparent, equal opportunity for all buyers, but its current implementation allowing participation by core sector and traders undermines the distinction between linked and non‑linked consumers and violates Article 14 (!) (!) (!) . - Non‑linked consumers, especially small‑scale and hard‑coke manufacturers, are entitled to protection against arbitrary pricing and discriminatory treatment, and any deviation from the linkage system must be based on genuine consumer identification and public interest (!) (!) (!) .

What is the scope of the coal companies' power to fix the price of coal when acting as an instrumentality of the State?

What are the conditions under which the e‑auction scheme for coal sale can be constitutionally valid?

What are the rights of non‑core sector consumers (including traders and small‑scale industries) in the coal distribution and pricing mechanism?


Judgment

S.B. SINHA, J. -

Introduction

1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.

2. The validity and/or legality of a scheme framed by Coal India Limited for sale of coal by electronic auction (e - auction) is in question in these appeals and transferred applications.

3. "Coal" indisputably plays an important role in the development of b economy of the country. It had been the subject - matter of regulatory measures even under the Defence of India Rules. Production, distribution, supply and price of coal were controlled and regulated under the Colliery Control Order, 1945 (the 1945 Order) framed under the said Rules. The said Order was continued under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Under the Colliery Control Order, the Coal Controller was even authorised to allot quotas of coal to the Central Government as well as the State Governments; C although the said procedure is now not in vogue in view of decontrolling notifications issued there under by the Central Government from time to time. The quality as well as quantity of coal required by all consumers used to be regulated by the Coal Controller. Coal was the only mineral which was subjected to nationalisation, in terms of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973. d Even coal - mining leases granted to the lessees stood terminated by reason of Section 4 - A of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 in the year 1976.

4. Coal is used as a primary raw material in many core sectors which are vital for the economy of the country e.g. power, steel, oil, etc. Fixation of price of coal by the Central Government, regarding the quality thereof, had e all along been subjected to statutory orders. The gradation of coal dependent upon the quality thereof was to be determined by the "Coal Board" constituted under the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act. Quality of coal may depend not only on the location of the coal mines but also on the particular seams wherefrom it is extracted. Requirement of maintenance of fixed price of coal on an all - India basis, as far as practicable f had all along been considered to be imperative in the economic and industrial development of the country.

Control over coal

5. Coal indisputably is an essential commodity. Its importance is widely accepted. The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was enacted inter alia for securing equitable distribution and availability of essential commodities at g fair price. Coal despite partial deregulation having regard to the Colliery Control Order, 2000 (the 2000 Order) is still a regulated commodity.

6. The 1945 Order made provisions for regulating production, supply and distribution of coal. It dealt with class of coal, grade of coal, size of coal and price of coal. Clause (3) empowered the Central Government to prescribe classes, sizes, grades, etc. into which coal may be categorised as also the h specifications thereof on the said basis.


7. Whereas coking coal having inherent property of swelling on heating is essentially used for metallurgical purposes in the steel plant for production of steel, all other categories of coal are non - coking coals. Non - coking coal is used as a raw material in manufacturing processes such as cement, graphite, soft coke, domestic fuel and for production of various products such as glass, food processing, ceramics, chemicals, re - rolling mills, salt glazed stoneware pipes, refractory used for steel - making, etc. The different sizes of the coal are inter alia known as "Run of the Mine", "Steam" and "Slack". The price of coal depends not only with reference to the grade but size as also the seams situated in the coking coal mines or coal mines, as the case may be.

8. Clauses 12 - Band 12 - E of the 1945 Order were, however, invoked by the Central Government from time to time by issuing notifications as a result whereof controls over price and distribution of coal were withdrawn. However,

















































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top