DAYA CHAUDHARY
Jai Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J.:- This order of mine shall dispose of two petitions i.e. Crl. Revn. No. 2181 of 2005 and Crl. Misc. No. M-10627 of 2006. However, for the sake of convenience, facts have been extracted from Crl. Revn. No. 2181 of 2005.
2. The present revision petition has been filed by accused-petitioner- Jai Pal against judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.11.2003 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kurukshetra, whereby, the petitioner was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 420,467,468,471 and 423 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 420 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years with fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 467 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 300/- under Section 468 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with fine of Rs. 200 under Section 471 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 423 IPC. In case of default of payment of fine, accused was ordered to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months. Aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.