SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 629

JASPAL SINGH
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rachhpal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jaspal Singh, J.: - Challenge in this civil revision petition is to the order dated 25.07.2013 (Annexure P-1) passed by ld. Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib whereby an application filed by the petitioner seeking permission to lead additional evidence by way of producing on record affidavit dated 04.05.2005 executed by plaintiff-petitioner and proving the same by examining Amrik Singh, Lambardar has been dismissed.

2. While assailing the impugned order dated 25.07.2013, it has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the same is absolutely against the settled canons of law. The ld. trial court has failed to appreciate the fact that the entire case of the petitioner is based upon the fact that whether the petitioner was ready to perform his part of contract or not. In order to prove the said fact, the petitioner has led his evidence, but inadvertently, due to the lapse on the part of the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner before the trial court, the said affidavit could not be produced on record earlier. Otherwise also, the petitioner is not going to be benefitted by withholding such a material piece of evidence, and it















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top