SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 813

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Gurpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kamaljit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate.
.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J.:- This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 28.02.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Phillaur, Jalandhar, whereby, the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of plaint has been dismissed.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner, through his brother, namely, Sh. Harbans Singh, had purchased the land measuring 3 kanals 10 marlas 6.5 sarsai, out of total property along with all rights having Electric Motor Connection in the land, in dispute. Defendant/respondents threatened the petitioner to disconnect, transfer, shift or to sell out the tubewell connection or to create hindrance in use of tubewell connection. The petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from transferring, shifting and disconnecting the Electric Tubewell/Submersible Motor Connection bearing No.APR 102 of 7.5 HP and also for restraining the defendants from interfering into peaceful enjoyment and usage of the plaintiff.

3. Written statement to the suit was filed and thereafter, replication to the written statement was























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top