SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1433

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitionera:Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Tejpal Dhull, Advocate, Mr. B.S. Rana, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gagandeep Rana, Advocate, Mr. Gobind Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Middha, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Malik, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate, Mr. Sant Lal Barwala, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Girdhwal, Advocate, Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate, Mr. Raj Kumar Chandana, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate, Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate, Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, Mr. D. R. Bansal, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Hooda, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate, Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate, Mr. Rajinder S. Rana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

The controversy in these petitions is as to whether the petitioners can be declared eligible for being considered for appointment to the posts of Post Graduate Teachers (Mathematics), in view of the fact that the results of the examinations for the degrees they were to obtain to make them eligible for the said posts, were not declared officially by the University concerned by the cut off date prescribed in the advertisement inviting applications, i.e. 12.10.2015.

The contention of the petitioners is that they had, however, all obtained the result confidentially from the respondent University, i.e. the Maharshi Dayanand University, upon making an application to that effect before the University and as per the said results, they all passed the examinations which made them eligible for being considered as candidates for the posts in question.

2. Mr. R.K. Malik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in CWP no.27021 of 2016, has referred to certificates issued by the University in respect of all the petitioners in CWP no.27021 of 2016 (Annexure P-13 to P-21), by which the University has certified that the petitioners had passed the B.Ed. exami





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top