SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2169

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Soma Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kashmiri Lal – Respondent


For the Petitioners:Mr. Rajesh Gupta & Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral):- This is the second appeal filed by defendant No. 1 in the suit against a judgment and decree whereby the lower Appelalte Court has reversed the decree passed in her favour by the Trial Court in her counter claim.

2. For the reference in the present appeal, the parties would be referred to as the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2 as described in the original plaint.

3. The fact of the, case as mentioned in the judgment of the lower Appellate Court, are that the suit was filed by one Baljeet against Soma Devi, defendant No.1 (the present appellant) and Kashmiri Lal, defendant No. 2 (respondent No. 1 in the present appeal) alleging that he was owner in possession of the residential house situated at Sodagran Mohalla, Ravidass Nagar, Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. The patnala (water outlet) and the ventilator of the house of the plaintiff open on the back side in a common ‘gher’ (common yard). It was further pleaded that on the southern side there was house of defendant No. 1 and on the eastern side there was house of defendant No. 2. It was further pleaded that the ventilator and the water outlet of his house in the common yard






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top