SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 446

SURINDER GUPTA
P. K. Verma – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

SURINDER GUPTA, J.

1. This is appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 28.02.2006 passed by Special Judge, CBI, Punjab at Patiala, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short-P.C. Act) and sentenced as follows:-

Sr. No.

Under Section

Sentence.

1.

7 of P.C. Act.

Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.

2.

13(1)(d) read with Sec. 13(2) of P.C. Act.

Rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months.

FIR (Ex.PW5/1) in this case was registered on the complaint dated 22.06.2000 (Ex.PW1/1) of Paramjit Singh, which reads as follows:-

“I am contractor by profession. I am registered with Chief Engineer, Western Command, Chandimandir vide index No.A-6. I have been t







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top