Amol Rattan Singh, J.

By this petition, the petitioner, who is a Sub-Inspector in the Haryana Police, firstly seeks quashing of the adverse remarks conveyed about him to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, by the Commissioner of Police, Ambala-Panchkula, vide a communication dated 25.11.2013 (annexed as Annexure P-1 with the petition).

The adverse remarks cover the period from 07.05.2012 to 12.02.2013, with the representation made by him against such adverse remarks also having been rejected, vide a communication between the same officers, dated 24.03.2014 (Annexure P-3).

Thus, he seeks the quashing of that communication also, and further, quashing of the notice issued to him on 02.04.2014 (Annexure P4), informing him that in terms of Rule 3.26 (d) of the Punjab Civil Services Rules Vol.-I Part-I, read with Rule 9.18 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (both Rules as applicable to the State of Haryana), upon having attained the age of 55 years on 27.12.2013, he would stand retired from service on 30.06.2014, i.e. 3 months after the issuance of the notice.

2. The facts, as given in the petition, are that the petitioner joined service as a Constable on 17.04.1978, having