AMIT RAWAL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Jogi Ram – Respondent
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. This order of mine shall dispose of two Regular Second Appeals bearing No.210 and 209 of 2011 arisen out of the decision of Civil Suit No.256 of 2008 titled as “Jogi Ram Versus Smt.Ram Devi & others”, for declaration challenging the sale deed 8/9.6.1998 with consequential relief of permanent injunction and Civil Suit No.257 of 2008 titled as “Jogi Ram Versus Baldeva & others”, for possession.
2. Both the aforementioned suits were filed by Jogi Ram on the basis of judgment and decree dated 27.9.1995, upheld upto Hon'ble Supreme Court, whereby the suit seeking declaration with permanent injunction was decreed and his reversionary rights qua half share in the suit property were protected.
3. This case has a chequered history. It would be apt to give facts of the previous litigation, resulting into passing of the judgment and decree dated 27.9.1995.
4. Jamna was the owner of the property. He had one son Tulsi, who had executed a Will dated 15.4.1968 in favour of Jogi Ram (his son) and Ram Devi (second wife), i.e., mother of Jogi Ram. The contents of the Will gave the limited right to Ram Devi that she could enjoy the property during her life time with a bar that
Jupudy Pardha Sarathy Vs. Pentapati Rama Krishna and others
Kulwant Kaur and others Vs. Gurdial Singh Mann (dead) by LRs and others
Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal & Ors. Vs. Dossibai N.B. Jeejeebhoy
Pankajakshi (dead) through LRs and others Vs. Chandrika and others
Shakuntla Devi Vs. Kamla & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.