P.B.BAJANTHRI
A. R. Madhav Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
P.B. Bajanthri, J.
1. By this common order, both the afore-mentioned Criminal Misc. Petitions i.e. CRM M-2068 of 2012 and CRM M-33057 of 2011 are being decided together as similar facts are involved in both the petitions.
2. In CRM M-2068 of 2012, petitioners have prayed for quashing FIR No. 106 dated 23.03.2011, under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Sadar Gurgaon, District Gurgaon and report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dated 26.09.2011 (Annexures P/1 and P/7 respectively) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
3. In CRM M-33057 of 2011, petitioners have prayed for quashing FIR No. 106 dated 23.03.2011, under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Sadar Gurgaon, District Gurgaon and report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dated 20.05.2011 (Annexures P/1 and P/2 respectively) along with resultant proceedings pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon.
4. Petitioners, namely, A.R. Madhav Rao, R.K. Hasija, M.P. Devnath and Nishant Mishra are advocates by profession, whereas Inder Singh Bisht and Ganesh Prasad Sati are w
Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs. State of West Bengal
Gurcharan Singh vs. State of Punjab
M. Mohan vs. D.S.P., Karaikudi
Madan Mohan Singh vs. State of Gujarat and another
Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Randhir Singh vs. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.