SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, DEEPAK SIBAL
Major Harmohinder Singh (Retd. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Satish Kumar Mittal, J.
The appellant, a senior citizen, has filed the present intra court appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent against the order dated 12.08.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition (CWP No. 24392 of 2013) filed by the appellant seeking direction to the State of Punjab (respondents No.1 and 2) to implement the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2007') by creating authorities under Section 22 of the Act of 2007 for protection of life and property of the senior citizens, has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the learned Single Judge has erred in law while not issuing the aforesaid direction, as the similar direction was issued by this Court in the case of Union Territory, Chandigarh, in Justice Shanti Sarup Dewan and another v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and others (2014(5) R.C.R. (Civil) 656 : LPA No. 1007 of 2013 decided on 26.09.2013), directing the Administration of Union Territory, Chandigarh, to take steps to bring into force proper rules under Section 32 (1) of the Act of 2007 for the purposes mentioned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.