SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1730

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, DEEPAK SIBAL
Major Harmohinder Singh (Retd. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Atul Lakhanpal, R.S. Chahal

JUDGMENT :

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

The appellant, a senior citizen, has filed the present intra court appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent against the order dated 12.08.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition (CWP No. 24392 of 2013) filed by the appellant seeking direction to the State of Punjab (respondents No.1 and 2) to implement the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2007') by creating authorities under Section 22 of the Act of 2007 for protection of life and property of the senior citizens, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the learned Single Judge has erred in law while not issuing the aforesaid direction, as the similar direction was issued by this Court in the case of Union Territory, Chandigarh, in Justice Shanti Sarup Dewan and another v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and others (2014(5) R.C.R. (Civil) 656 : LPA No. 1007 of 2013 decided on 26.09.2013), directing the Administration of Union Territory, Chandigarh, to take steps to bring into force proper rules under Section 32 (1) of the Act of 2007 for the purposes mentioned







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top