SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2613

RITU BAHRI
Ritu Rani – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :R.S. Longia, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Suman Jain, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

RITU BAHRI, J.

1. Present appeal has been preferred by the claimants-appellants (for short 'the appellants'), against award dated 4th March, 2013, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra (for short, 'the Tribunal') whereby in a claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, compensation to the tune of Rs. 6,50,128/- was awarded to the claimants on account of death of Raj Kumari @ Paro along with her son Tej Pal who died in a motor vehicle accident.

2. On 21st April, 2012, Raj Kumari @ Paro (since deceased) along with her son Tej Pal (since deceased) had proceeded from Village Dhyangla to Ladwa for taking medicines of Raj Kumari @ Paro on motorcycle No.HR-07P-2212 which was driven by Tej Pal at a moderate speed and on due left side of the road. Arun Kumar was following them on separate motorcycle. At about 03:00 p.m. when they reached near I.G.N. College in the area of Village Dhanuara then the offending motorcycle bearing No.HR- 07H-5721 being driven by respondent No.1 Amarjit Singh in a rash and negligent manner and in violation







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top