SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 2186

RAJESH BINDAL
Baru – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Surender Pal, Ashish Gupta, S.N. Pillania, S.K. Verma, Arvind Chauhan, Munish Kumar Garg.
For the Respondent: Abhinash Jai.

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. This order will dispose of RFA Nos. 4092, 4225 of 2010, RFA Nos. 2514, 6955 of 2011 and RFA Nos. 9821, 9832, 9833, 9838, 9839, 10017 to 10055, 10478, 10479, 10826 to 10839 of 2014 and RFA Nos. 7, 16 to 21, 31, 67, 69, 71, 120 to 127, 198 to 204, 213, 217, 342 to 346, 386 to 389, 411 to 415, 518, 640 to 642, 816, 886, 963, 982 to 989, 1021, 1022, 1489, 1576, 2037, 2039, 2040, 2092 to 2099, 2147, 2148, 2164, 2180, 2244, 2553 to 2556, 2611, 2612, 4547 of 2015, as the same arise out of common acquisition.

2. By filing appeal, the landowners are seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.

3. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 9.9.2002, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act), the State of Haryana sought to acquire 380.11 acres of land situated in village Jind, Hadbast No. 79 and 98.89 acres of land situated in village Haibatpur, Hadbast No. 72, Tehsil and District Jind, for development and utilisation thereof as residential, commercial sectors 6, 7, 8, and 9 at Jind. Notification under




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top