SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2415

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Nihala – Appellant
Versus
Irshad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :P.R. Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondent:Pankaj Jain, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

C.M. No. 19804-CII of 2016

This application is for placing on record judgment and decree dated 15.6.2010 (Annexure P-9).

Application is allowed. Annexure P-9 with the application is taken on record.

C.R. No. 6174 of 2016

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 29.7.2016 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mewat whereby the application moved by the petitioner for leading additional evidence and order dated 29.7.2016 (Annexure P-8) whereby the application for summoning the Patwari of village Balhad, Tehsil Nuh, District Mewat along with original register of Khasra Girdawari for the period Kharif 1983 to Rabi 1988 have been dismissed.

2. The petitioners are the legal representatives of defendant-Nihala, who expired on 19.6.2014 during pendency of the proceedings, who were brought on record vide order dated 10.10.2014.

3. Petitioners are aggrieved with the order passed while dismissing their application for leading additional evidence in order to place on record certified copies of Jamabandis, which were stated to be received by them just befo























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top