SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2618

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Brijeshwar Swaroop – Appellant
Versus
Adish Aggarwal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Rajiv Kataria, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Raj Mohan Singh, J.

This revision petition has arisen from the order dated 09.02.2016 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Safidon, vide which application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint filed by defendants No.1, 4 to 6 was dismissed.

2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they are owners in possession of agricultural land measuring 8 kanals, 10 marlas being 1/6th share each out of total land measuring 25 kanals, 10 marlas as shown in the plaint in the revenue estate of Safidon, District Jind vide jamabandi for the year 2009-10 and as per sale deed dated 25.09.1957 and mutation No.1056. Plaintiffs and defendants are claimed to be in joint possession of the land measuring 25 kanals, 10 marlas being joint Hindu family property being the coparcener of the family of Rattan Chand son of Kali Ram. Declaration has also been sought in respect of sale deed dated 28.04.2000 in the name of defendant No.4 on the basis of registered sale deed dated 25.09.1957 and mutation No.1056 to be part of the share of defendant Nos.1, 5 and 6 and not binding upon the rights of the plaintiffs and defendants No.2, 3, 7 and 8 with consequential relief of pe
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top