SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3199

M.JEYAPAUL, SNEH PRASHAR
ARUN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Kanhiya Soni, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

M. JEYAPAUL, J.

1. On asking of the Court Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate took notice for Union of India.

2. Heard the submissions made on either side.

3. The petitioner is a practicing advocate, who has invoked extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 read with 227 of the Constitution of India, in respect of a PMLA Complaint No.4 of 2015 filed by an authority under PMLA before the Special Court for PMLA at Mumbai in ECIR no. ECIR/14/MZO/2013 inter alia against M/s Namdhari Food International Pvt. Ltd., Shri Inder Singh Bal, Shri Iqbal Singh Bal, Shri Surjit Singh Bal, M/s. Namdhari Rice and General Mills, Shri Daljit Singh Bal, Shri Jaspal Singh Bal and Jai Singh Bal, collectively known as `Namdhari Group' of Sirsa, Haryana. The said ECIR was registered on the basis of Scheduled offences alleged in FIR No. 216 of 2013 registered u/s 120B, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 477(A) of IPC inter alia against the said two companies, which was later investigated by Economic Offence Wing, Mumbai by renumbering the same as CR no. 89 of 2013. Charge Sheet and Supplementary Charge Sheets have been filed in the said Scheduled Offence in CR no. 89 of 2013. Vide a Provisional Attachmen






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top