A.K.SIKRI
SANJAY CHATURVEDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
A. K. SIKRI, J.
( 1 ) EXEMPTION allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
( 2 ) APPLICATION stands disposed of.
( 3 ) NOTICE. Mr. Soni accepts notice for the State. I have heard the learned Counsel at length.
( 4 ) COMPLAINT cases titled as M/s. Development Credit Bank v. M/s. Shamken snippers Ltd. under Sections 138/141, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is filed in which the petitioner Mr. Sanjay Chaturvedi is arrayed as one of the accused persons. He was summoned for 14th July, 2006. Petitioner appeared through his Counsel on that date and moved as application for exemption from his personal appearance. Finding no merit in the said application, the same was dismissed by the learned ACMM. The learned ACMM issued non-bailable warrants against the petitioner for 26th August, 2006. These NWBs could not be executed for 26th August, 2006 with the report that premises were found locked and whereabout of petitioner could not be traced. In these circumstances, on 26th August, 2006, the learned ACMM has issued process under sections 82/83, Cr. P. C. against the petitioner and similar co-accused persons.
( 5 ) IN this petition, the petitioner is challenging both the orders dated 14th Ju
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.