SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3447

REKHA MITTAL
Surjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Chatrath, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J.:- The present petition directs challenge against order dated 12.09.2016 (Annexure P3) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ambala whereby application filed by the petitioners under Order XI Rules 12, 14 and 15 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, CPC) seeking production of documents, has been dismissed.

2. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Surjit Kaur and Amandeep Kaur, successors-in-interest of Bakshish Singh filed a suit for declaration claiming that they are absolute owners in possession of plotcum- built up house bearing No. 111-A, measuring 1200 square yards, situated at Village Mandhour, Tehsil and District Ambala. They have prayed for setting aside cancellation of allotment of the said plot being null and void, illegal and not binding upon the petitioners. The respondents filed the written statement and, in turn, raised objection qua maintainability of the suit with the averments that allotment of plot in question was cancelled after vigilance inquiry conducted in the year 1987.

3. The petitioners filed the instant application (Annexure P1) for discovery and production of documents, detailed in para






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top