SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2297

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Satwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chanan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Premjit Kalia, Advocate for the appellants

JUDGMENT

Mr. Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral). - Plaintiff/appellants are in second appeal before this Court having remained unsuccessful in both the Courts below.

2. Briefly noticed, a suit for declaration was instituted by the plaintiffs to the effect that they are owners to the extent of half share in respect of land measuring 78 kanals and 13 marlas situated at Village Lakhowal, Tehsil Ajnala, District Amritsar and as per details furnished in the plaint. Consequential relief of permanent injunction was also sought for restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property in any manner.

3. Case set up on behalf of the plaintiff/appellants was that the suit land measuring 78 kanals, 13 marlas was previously under the ownership of Nand Singh and Charan Singh, who were jointly cultivating the land. Charan Singh was the father of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were stated to be in service and the defendant who was son-in-law of Nand Singh had played a fraud upon father of the plaintiffs and in pursuance thereto, a fraudulent sale deed was got executed by Charan Singh in favour of the defendant. It was averred that the sale deed, if any, is null, void, forged and fabricated and the re










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top