SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2351

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Dalbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Jaivir Yadav Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Ashok Gautam, Advocate, for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Gurvinder Singh Gill J.:- Appellant-defendant Dalbir Singh has filed this appeal challenging judgment dated 18.7.2014 passed by Additional District Judge, Kaithal whereby decretal of suit filed by respondent-plaintiff for possession of suit property has been affirmed.

2. The case set up by the respondent-plaintiff is that appellant-defendant had encroached upon 15 square yards out of Khasra No.608 and 10 square yards out of Khasra No.609 owned by the respondent-plaintiff situated in Village Teontha, Tehsil and District Kaithal. The respondent-plaintiff averred that the adjacent land comprised in Khasra No.607 and 610 is owned by the appellant-defendant and that earlier the respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for injunction and wherein upon demarcation conducted by the order of the Court, he came to know that appellant-defendant had encroached upon his land and thereafter he withdrew the said injunction suit and filed a suit for possession. The appellant defendant contested the suit and filed written statement denying all the material averments made in the plaint.

3. The parties was put to proof on the following issues :-

“1.Whether the plaintiff is owner of Baras fall















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top