SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3552

DARSHAN SINGH
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kashmir Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Paramjit Batta, Advocate
For the Respondents:N.S. Dandiwal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Darshan Singh, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Tract Court-II, Hoshiarpur, vide which the appeal filed by the appellant-defendant against the judgment and decree dated 23.04.2007 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Dasuya, has been dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties is being mentioned as in the original suit.

3. Plaintiff-respondent Kashmir Singh has brought a suit for possession of land measuring 2 Kanals comprised of Khasra no. 61 (4-0) situated at Village Kalu Chang on the allegations that he and his brothers namely Balbir Singh and Sukhdev Singh are joint owners in possession thereof. Defendants have got no right, title or interest in the suit land. They are strong headed persons and taking the undue advantage of their man-power, they had taken the illegal possession of the land measuring 2 Kanals out of the aforesaid Khasra number. Their possession is illegal and unauthorized and is that of a trespasser. They are liable to vacate the suit land after the removal of the superstructure. In





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top