RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Jagbir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
RAJIV SHARMA, J.
1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the aforesaid three appeals and one revision petition, therefore, these are taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment.
2. These appeals and revision petition have been instituted against the judgment and order dated 11.08.2003 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Faridabad, in Sessions Case No.67 of 24.04.2002/16.03.2001. The appellants along with one Jaipal were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 148, 302, 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). Appellant Jagbir was also charged with and tried for offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Appellants Jagbir, Sohan Pal and Ganga Ram have been convicted for committing murder of Aram Singh and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Appellants Jagbir, Ganga Ram, Sohan Pal, Tej Pal, Hari Ram and Kunwar Pal have been convicted and sentenced to undergo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.