SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 182

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Suresh Jindal – Appellant
Versus
Usha Jindal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikas Bahl, Adv., Nitish Garg, Adv., Dhruv Walia, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.

1. Petitioners have preferred this revision petition against the order dated 21.08.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Ambala, vide which the application filed by petitioners under Sections 151, 152 and 153 CPC for correction in the plaint, judgment and decree was dismissed.

2. Brief facts are that the plaintiffs/petitioners filed a suit for declaration to the effect that they were in joint possession to the extent of 1/6th share i.e. 107/643th share along with the defendants in the land bearing Khewat/Khatauni No.38/54, Khasra Nos.27//2 (8-0), 3/4 (1-7), 8(7-18), 9(8-0) and 12/1(6-18) total land measuring 32 Kanals 3 Marlas situated in the revenue estate of village Kakru, Hadbast No.31, Tehsil & District Ambala as per jamabandi for the year 1996-97 on the basis of inheritance of the estate of Sh. Pawan Kumar deceased as held in Civil Appeal titled 'Sukhdev Parshad & others vs. Suresh Jindal & others', decided on 31.10.2002 by the Addl. District Judge, Patiala with a consequential relief of declaration, declaring the sale deed to be null and void executed by Sukhdev Parshad (deceased) represented by the defendants No.1 and 2 (legal representatives





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top