SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 230

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Manjuli Joshi, Adv., Vandana Malhotra, Adv., Monika Jangra, Adv., A.S. Gill, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.

1. This order disposes of FAO No.2029 of 2010 filed by the appellants-driver and owner of Scorpio bearing registration No.PB-08-AT-3734 impleaded as respondents No.1 and 2 in MACT Case No. 2 of 2008 titled Jaswinder Singh and another Vs. Vijay Kumar and others and Cross Objections No.81-CII of 2010 filed by the parents of deceased Balwant Singh, claimants in the above said MACT Case impleaded as respondents No.2 and 3 in the present appeal.

2. Jaswinder Singh and Joginder Kaur-parents of deceased Balwant Singh filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 (for short "the M.V. Act") before the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar (for short "the Tribunal") on the averments that on 07.05.2007 at about 06:30 P.M. Balwant Singh along with Harpreet Singh was going on motorcycle towards Rama Mandi. When they reached near the tubewell cum residence of Rashpal Singh on Nangal Fateh Khana-Patara Road, Scorpio bearing Registration No.PB-08-AT3734, owned by respondent No.2 and insured with respondent No.3, driven by respon






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top