SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 231

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
BINESH – Appellant
Versus
SAHID – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ashish Gupta, Adv., Vandana Malhotra, Adv., Monika Jangra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.

1. The appellant-claimant No.3-daughter of deceased Rambhulla has filed the present appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (for short "the Tribunal") vide award dated 09.03.2010 passed in MACT Case No.31 of 06.03.2009 titled as Bahadur and others Vs. Sahid and others on account of death of Rambhulla due to injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident which took place on 25.01.2009.

2. The claimants-Bahadur and Jaswant sons and Binesh daughter of Rambhulla filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short "the M.V. Act") on the averments that on 25.01.2009 at about 06:30 P.M., Rambhulla along with one Kale Khan was going from Behrampur Market towards village Khandsa. When they reached near village Naharpur, Indica car bearing registration No.RJ-14-AT-5110, owned by respondent No.2 and insured with respondent No.3, driven by respondent No.1 at a high speed, rashly and negligently came and struck against Rambhulla, who suffered multiple and grievous i





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top