RAJIV SHARMA, KULDIP SINGH
DINESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
RAJIV SHARMA, J.
1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the aforesaid three appeals, therefore these are taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment.
2. These three appeals are instituted against the judgment and order dated 05.10.2010 and 08.10.2010 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, in Sessions Case No.33 of 2008 whereby the appellants, who were charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC'), have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
Under Section
Sentence
302/34 IPC
To undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each.
201/34 IPC
To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months each.
120-B IPC
To undergo rigo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.