SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 329

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Simarjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Khushi Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Balkar Singh, Suvir Dewan.

JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Tyagi, J.

1. The claimants, widow, minor son and parents of the deceased-Mehnga Singh, have filed present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri (for short the Tribunal) vide award dated 01.09.2007 passed in MACT Case No. 118 of 2005 titled as Simarjeet Kaur and Others vs. Khushi Ram and Others on account of death of Mehnga Singh due to injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident which took place on 09.10.2005.

2. The above said claimants filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the M.V. Act) on the averments that on 09.10.2005 at about 6:00 p.m. deceased-Mehnga Singh was going to Patiala on motor cycle bearing registration No. HR-02M-7560 with Luvpreet Singh alias Gurjant Singh as pillion rider. When they reached near bus stand Majal, District Patiala, Toyota Qualis bearing registration No. PB-56-4444, owned by respondent No. 2 and 3 and insured with respondent No. 4-Insurance Company, driven by respondent No. 1 came from the oppo




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top