AMIT RAWAL
Tarsem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Balwant Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Amit Rawal, J.:- The present revision at the instance of the petitioner-plaintiff is directed against the impugned order dated 25.08.2017 (Annexure P-1), whereby the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint owing to the occurrence of the subsequent events, has been dismissed.
2. Petitioner-plaintiff filed the suit against the respondentdefendants for possession as owner claiming specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 12.04.2006 in respect of land measuring 11 kanals 2 Marlas. However, when the suit was at the initial stage, part of the land measuring 4 kanals 17 marlas was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India for widening of the road. In view of such circumstances, the permission was sought to implead the aforementioned NHAI as party. The trial Court declined the application. However, Civil Revision No.2291 of 2017 filed in this Court was disposed of vide order dated 04.04.2018 and the application for impleadment of the NHAI was allowed. However, during the pendency of the revision petition, petitioner-plaintiff had also filed an application dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) for amendment of the plaint on two coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.