SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 177

HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikram Bali, Advocate, for the Appellant; Rana Harjasdeep Singh, DAG, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Harminder Singh Madaan, J. - This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 27.4.2006 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hoshiarpur vide which he had convicted accused Pawan Kumar for the offences under Sections 279, 304-A and 427 IPC and order of the even date vide which the said accused was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 279 IPC and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 304-A IPC and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 427 IPC and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month; all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently, as well as judgment dated 8.6.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Track Court, Hoshiarpur vide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top